Meeting Banner
Abstract #0140

Methodological Issues in Comparing Brain Connectivity Between Groups

John McGonigle1, 2, Majid Mirmehdi2, Laurence Reed1, Andrea Malizia3

1Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; 2Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; 3Psychopharmacology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

When examining functional connectivity in the brain it is common to compare the synchrony of the mean time courses of spatially separated regions of interest and model these as edges between nodes in a graph. However, in creating a node, due to the commutative nature of the averaging, the quality of the time course can be driven by the number of voxels in the region in the native space of the subject. We explore this issue using real and simulated data and find that differences in apparent connectivity between groups with systematically different structure and volume may be artefactual.

Keywords

adding affects aged agreement almost amplitude anatomically apparent apparently approaches arising around atlas atlases averaging become bias bigger brain bristol brought cleaner coefficients coherence coincident college commutative comparing connections connectivity constructed controls correcting correlation cortical course courses depend detectable deviation discover distribution drug edges emerges especially even every examine examined expected experiment explored extended female find forcing form full functional graph greater healthy identical imperial important individual intrinsic introduced issues kingdom leading length likewise little male measure measures methodological minutes missed motion much native network node nodes noise normalization ordinate overlapping pair pairs part particular peak phantoms potentially predicted produce project properties real recently reed regional require resting rise rising schizophrenia session significantly similarity simulated simulation simulations since sites smaller space spatial sphere step stronger structural structure structures subjects subset susceptible systematic systematically taken task theoretic thorough though thought threshold transformed underlying unit usually various varying volumes whether widespread women young