Meeting Banner
Abstract #4523

Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Comparison of SR-TurboFLASH and SR-TrueFISP at 1.5T and 3.0T

Stefan Weber1, Inci Davulcu1, Christoph Dber2, Karl Friedrich Kreitner2, Laura Maria Schreiber1

1Department of Radiology, Section of Medical Physics, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany; 2Department of Radiology, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging is a very promising concept for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. The Aim of this work was to investigate and compare the two for myocardial perfusion imaging established pulse sequences SR-TurboFLASH and SR-TrueFISP at 1.5T and 3.0T. The pulse sequences and field strengths were compared with regard to SNR and CNR as well as for their intra-observer variability in absolute quantification of the myocardial blood flow. SR-TrueFISP at 3.0T yielded highest SNR and CNR values as well as the lowest intra-observer variability.

Keywords

absolute absorption acceleration acquisition agent allowed analyses approved array artery assess assessment avoid balanced bandwidth best better blood called cardiac choice circulation clinical closer coefficient coefficients coil combination committee conclude concordance conditions consent contrast coronary correlation curves despite disease drastically element elements ethic even examinations feasibility field flow free furthermore gradient healthy highest highly important included individual influence injected injection insight intra laura like local lowest magnetization maria material medical middle minutes model myocardial myocardium noise noninvasive observer occurring panting parallel pass peak perfusion phys physics precision prepared prior pulse qualitative quantification quantitative radiology random reception recovery reduced remaining repetition resolution saline saturation section seems segmentation selective shared significantly solutions spatial spine spoiled steady strength strengths superior systems trio twice underwent usually variability volunteers waited weber written yielded yields