Meeting Banner
Abstract #4530

Coronary MRA at 3 Tesla a Qualitative Comparison of a Novel Adiabatic T2-Preparation with Classic MLEV4

Wolfgang G. Rehwald1, 2, Christoph Jensen2, Elizabeth R. Jenista2, David C. Wendell2, Enn-Ling Chen2, Raymond J. Kim2

1Cardiovascular MR R&D, Siemens Healthcare, Durham, NC, United States; 2Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

Non-contrast coronary MRA at 3T relies on a B1-, B0-, and motion-insensitive T2-preparation to accurately depict coronary anomalies and stenoses. We previously developed an adiabatic T2-preparation fulfilling these requirements. In the current study, we compared its performance to the clinical standard MLEV4. We scored the depiction quality of six representative coronary segments and the visibility of selected proximal artery segments, and tested for statistical differences. The adiabatic module provided significantly improved image quality in the selected segments, and detected significantly more of the proximal coronary segments. Visual inspection of curved MPRs obtained from the same data confirmed our results.

Keywords

accepted accurately acquisition adiabatic advancement angiography anomalies appears applied arrow artery assessment audience aware back best better blinded branch cardiac cardiology cardiovascular challenging channel circumflex classic clinical clinically coil complete consisting contemporary contrast coronary crux curved depict depiction designing developed distal dropout duke equipped error evaluated examined excellent existing females field flow frequency fully furthermore good gradient healthy identical insensitive integrated invisible ling magnetization males matrix mediocre misinterpreted module modules motion note novel paired parallel partitions performance physicians physicists planar poor preparation prepared previously proximal publication pulse pulses qualitative quality readers reconstruction rectangular reduction refocusing relies remains represents required resolution respectively restricted return robust robustness scale scanned scored scores segment segments sets sharper significantly solution statistically strengths suitable suppression sweep systematically table tailed target technologists territories towards twice typical useful usually vessel visibility visible visualization volunteers whereas white yellow