Meeting Banner
Abstract #3090

Comparison of Conventional Histology and Diffusion Weighted Microimaging for Estimation of Epithelial, Stromal, and Acinar Volumes in Prostate Tissue

Michael Zhao1, Esther Myint2, Geoffrey Watson3, Roger Bourne1

1University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2Laverty Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 3Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Diffusion weighted microimaging of fixed prostate tissue reveals distinct diffusivity differences between epithelium, stroma, and acinal spaces1. In normal glandular tissue changes in the relative volumes of epithelium and stroma explain ~60% of the variation in signal fraction of a biexponential model of diffusion signal decay. We hypothesise that microscopic tissue volume changes may also explain the observed strong correlation between cancer Gleason grade and apparent diffusion coefficient measured in vivo. In this pilot study we used semi-automated morphometry methods to quantify partial volumes of epithelium, stroma and acinal space in H&E-stained histological images of benign and cancerous prostate tissue and compared these results with segmentation and statistical analysis of diffusion weighted microimages of normal tissue.

Keywords

adobe agreement apparent appears audience automated bars basis benign biophysical biopsies biopsy black blue broad cancer cancerous cancers clinical clinically clinicians coefficient compartment components core correction correlation cropped curves decay decrease decreasing density development diameter diffusion diffusivity dimension distinct distribution earlier ensure epithelial epithelium error errors estimation explain field findings fitting five fixed formalin fraction glands glandular grade grant histograms histological histology hospital hyperplasia in vivo increasing isotropic journal layer light lumen magic manual manually marks measured medicine microscopic microscopy model models obvious occurs pang partial pathological pathology patients percentage pilot preliminary presence previous prince prostate quantify radiology relatively remainder researchers reveals risk roger royal samples scores segmentation segmented selection semi separate shah smaller space spaces specimen specimens stained statistical statistics step strong studies supported target tissue tool towards typically underestimate urology validated variability variation variations view visible volume volumes wand water