Meeting Banner
Abstract #0448

Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) in Healthy Subjects and Breast Cancer Patients: A Quantitative Evaluation & Comparison with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

MAGNA25Gene Young Cho1, 2, Linda Moy3, Scott DeGregorio3, Sungheon Kim1, Melanie Moccaldi3, Jane Kwon1, Steven Baete1, Daniel K. Sodickson1, Eric E. Sigmund1

1Radiology, NYU School of Medicine - Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York, NY, United States; 2NYU Sackler Institute of Biomedical Science, New York, NY, United States; 3Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States

Recent studies have used MRI biomarkers such as background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to correlate with prognostic factors of breast cancer and predict cancer odds. An increased BPE correlates significantly with higher odds ratios for developing breast cancer. In this study, BPE was measured from a cohort of healthy controls and breast cancer patients using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. BPE values were compared between controls and patients, and with diffusion metrics of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and in the patient lesions. Implications for the biophysical underpinnings of BPE and its interpretation are considered.

Keywords

aggressiveness aspiration avoid axial background bilateral biomedical biopsy bipolar blood breast breasts cancer capability carcinoma channel chosen coefficient cohort coil common comparative contrast control controls correlate correlation correlations curves decays derived developing diagnosis diffusion diffusivity distinction dominated dynamic either elucidate employ enhanced enhancement estrogen evaluation examination exploration extremely fatty findings fine flow full fully furthermore healthy highlighted hormone included incoherent indicates influence initial injection intriguing invasive king larger largest lateral lesion lesions location malignant maps matrix medicine microscopic molecular monitoring nearly noninvasive observations odds outlined pathological patient patients percent perfusion permeability physiology plot post predictive progesterone prognostic protocol prove proven qualitatively quantitative radiology recent receptor receptors regarding relatively requires risk scanned scanner school science screening selection sensitivity shot significance significantly since situ slices solutions space statistical status stronger studies subjects subtypes thereby tissue tool treatment trends tumor tumors twice types understand underwent various vascular versus vibe volume whose women year young